<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ambo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>food for thought about technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on S&#8217;Efricans get gored by brian</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/sefricans-get-gored/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Actually, listening to his diatribe on the day it struck me that he sounds more like a happy-clappy evangelist. Admittedly, I&#039;ve only experienced that once in my life when a girlfriend way back in the early 1980s dragged me along to a Rhema meeting that featured Pastor Ray in full voice. In both cases you are expected to take the pronouncement on faith. Same horse; different colour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, listening to his diatribe on the day it struck me that he sounds more like a happy-clappy evangelist. Admittedly, I&#8217;ve only experienced that once in my life when a girlfriend way back in the early 1980s dragged me along to a Rhema meeting that featured Pastor Ray in full voice. In both cases you are expected to take the pronouncement on faith. Same horse; different colour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on S&#8217;Efricans get gored by Ivo Vegter</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/sefricans-get-gored/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivo Vegter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-193</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s a used car salesman. No, wait, that&#039;s unfair to used car salesmen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s a used car salesman. No, wait, that&#8217;s unfair to used car salesmen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep it simple stupid by brian</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/keep-it-simple-stupid/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 06:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=82#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say that it would see the end of the energy efficient industry; just that it would loosen Philips&#039; grip on that industry while also providing an alternative that doesn&#039;t contain mercury. Also, don&#039;t be fooled by the wattage numbers. Current CFL bulbs are only 50% more efficient than incandescent ones. Check out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23694819/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt; for clarification.

b</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say that it would see the end of the energy efficient industry; just that it would loosen Philips&#8217; grip on that industry while also providing an alternative that doesn&#8217;t contain mercury. Also, don&#8217;t be fooled by the wattage numbers. Current CFL bulbs are only 50% more efficient than incandescent ones. Check out <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23694819/" rel="nofollow">this story</a> for clarification.</p>
<p>b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keep it simple stupid by Barry</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/keep-it-simple-stupid/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=82#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t see how it will spell the end of the energy-efficient industry. This thing is only 40% more efficient. That means that a normal 100 Watt globe now _only_ consumes 60 Watt of electricity. A 13 Watt CFL produces the same amount of light as a 100 Watt incadescent. Still worlds apart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t see how it will spell the end of the energy-efficient industry. This thing is only 40% more efficient. That means that a normal 100 Watt globe now _only_ consumes 60 Watt of electricity. A 13 Watt CFL produces the same amount of light as a 100 Watt incadescent. Still worlds apart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Linux goes retail by brian</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/ubuntu-linux-goes-retail/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info. The 60 days of support for newbies would definitely make the $20 a worthwhile investment. But where would users go for that? Is it explicit on the packaging? Presumably that&#039;s Canonical and not ValuSoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info. The 60 days of support for newbies would definitely make the $20 a worthwhile investment. But where would users go for that? Is it explicit on the packaging? Presumably that&#8217;s Canonical and not ValuSoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ubuntu Linux goes retail by Steve George</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/07/10/ubuntu-linux-goes-retail/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Hi,

So I wrote up a little bit about why we&#039;re putting Ubuntu into retailers like Best Buy on the Canonical blog: http://blog.canonical.com/?p=18

Essentially, it&#039;s to try and reach out to users who may not know about downloading Ubuntu, or don&#039;t have the bandwidth to do so.  Additionally, you do get 60 days of support to help you get up and running. Probably doesn&#039;t apply to you personally, but it&#039;s a big help to less technical users who are worried about installing a new operating system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>So I wrote up a little bit about why we&#8217;re putting Ubuntu into retailers like Best Buy on the Canonical blog: <a href="http://blog.canonical.com/?p=18" rel="nofollow">http://blog.canonical.com/?p=18</a></p>
<p>Essentially, it&#8217;s to try and reach out to users who may not know about downloading Ubuntu, or don&#8217;t have the bandwidth to do so.  Additionally, you do get 60 days of support to help you get up and running. Probably doesn&#8217;t apply to you personally, but it&#8217;s a big help to less technical users who are worried about installing a new operating system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Save us from Facebook humanism by Darren</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/06/08/save-us-from-facebook-humanism/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-181</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the mention and I&#039;m glad you liked John&#039;s post. It&#039;s always nice to be appreciated.

I would just like to point out that Commentary.co.za does actually let you link to particular posts, and each post has a &#039;Permalink&#039; link at the bottom of it. I&#039;m a bit perturbed that you missed it though, as it means our style might not be as clear as it should be. We may have to look at emphasising it a little more in the future.

For the record, the permanent link to John&#039;s post is http://commentary.co.za/archives/2008/06/07/facebook-humanism/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the mention and I&#8217;m glad you liked John&#8217;s post. It&#8217;s always nice to be appreciated.</p>
<p>I would just like to point out that Commentary.co.za does actually let you link to particular posts, and each post has a &#8216;Permalink&#8217; link at the bottom of it. I&#8217;m a bit perturbed that you missed it though, as it means our style might not be as clear as it should be. We may have to look at emphasising it a little more in the future.</p>
<p>For the record, the permanent link to John&#8217;s post is <a href="http://commentary.co.za/archives/2008/06/07/facebook-humanism/" rel="nofollow">http://commentary.co.za/archives/2008/06/07/facebook-humanism/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox tanks in the US; grows elsewhere, apparently by Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/firefox-tanks-in-the-us-grows-elsewhere-apparently/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Janco, you&#039;re not doing yourself any favors by arguing with me on a random blog. 

Your results are extreme outliers compared with what the entire rest of the industry sees. 

Perhaps 10 years ago your sample was more representative but it&#039;s clearly way off today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janco, you&#8217;re not doing yourself any favors by arguing with me on a random blog. </p>
<p>Your results are extreme outliers compared with what the entire rest of the industry sees. </p>
<p>Perhaps 10 years ago your sample was more representative but it&#8217;s clearly way off today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox tanks in the US; grows elsewhere, apparently by Janco</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/firefox-tanks-in-the-us-grows-elsewhere-apparently/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Janco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 18:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-177</guid>
		<description>We have been sampling for over ten years and were even included in the list of sites that the Justice Department used in its inverstigation.  Our results were even certified by a Judge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been sampling for over ten years and were even included in the list of sites that the Justice Department used in its inverstigation.  Our results were even certified by a Judge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox tanks in the US; grows elsewhere, apparently by Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/firefox-tanks-in-the-us-grows-elsewhere-apparently/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brianbakker.wordpress.com/?p=54#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Janco Associates, there&#039;s just no way that Netscape has 10% of the market. That disagrees with the results of every other survey out there and it doesn&#039;t come close to reflecting what the major search sites are seeing either. It&#039;s just wrong. 

I certainly understand users reluctant to change, trust me on that. It&#039;s our biggest single challenge in getting them to move to a better browser with Firefox. But that doesn&#039;t make your 10+% number for Netscape any less wrong. 

Now, I don&#039;t dispute that within your sample, Netscape has a big share, but that reflects poorly on your sample and the general applicability of the results of your survey. Like I said, it just doesn&#039;t agree with anything that anyone else in the world is seeing. It doesn&#039;t even come close.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janco Associates, there&#8217;s just no way that Netscape has 10% of the market. That disagrees with the results of every other survey out there and it doesn&#8217;t come close to reflecting what the major search sites are seeing either. It&#8217;s just wrong. </p>
<p>I certainly understand users reluctant to change, trust me on that. It&#8217;s our biggest single challenge in getting them to move to a better browser with Firefox. But that doesn&#8217;t make your 10+% number for Netscape any less wrong. </p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t dispute that within your sample, Netscape has a big share, but that reflects poorly on your sample and the general applicability of the results of your survey. Like I said, it just doesn&#8217;t agree with anything that anyone else in the world is seeing. It doesn&#8217;t even come close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
